ruicarlov wrote on 15^th Mar, 2016 at 11:04pm:


If you look at the earnings from MTV, things don't go hot and cold overnight. They tend to fluctuate a lot but it tends to average in a general upwards direction. And if something does change in a big way they usually know about why and it is usually tied to a big investor doing things.

We got no explanation about this from YGP even though they would know and have the data if it were a big player or many big players. An explanation like this would calm people down since it is rational. Going hot for weeks and then absolutely cold is not rational statistically unless there is an anomaly and it would be wise for them to explain. Instead we get their usual flippancy and disrespect to the people that are putting food on their tables which has been turning me off for quite some time. Why would I trust a site that does something like this knowing the industry's bad reputation for drawing people in with ponzi like returns?

If it is something as innocent as bad management communications then it is still not something I want to trust my money to until I get better insight. The investment dollar is limited for me and I need to be cautious. I'm willing to trust them with their dollars but not any more of mine. Even if those dollars are coming from other sites. The tone of their communications is sending a red flag for me in a big way. Almost like they know something but are not willing to tell us

ruicarlov wrote on 16^th Mar, 2016 at 12:32pm:


Yes, you are right. MTVs transparency is the exception, definitely not the norm, but they can use that to explain big swings. My main point is that with such dramatic swings they should have a better explanation. Instead we get a half sarcastic answer saying we are a bunch of complainers that should do more work and give them more of our cash and that they never heard any complaining when things were good.

As a more serious investor than average in this industry, is this supposed to encourage me to invest when my money can go to any of a dozen sites?

moneymarketing,

rui does have a point. I'm not even sure if the owner's native language is English to begin with.

And there were times in the past that you did let your emotions get the best of you thinking "the owner is out to get you or something" only to eventually either realize that the program was better than you originally thought once cooler heads prevailed or that it was even your own mistake.

So whatever decision you make on the program, make sure it's based on merit.

I meant well when I posted the admin's response in the forum, didn't mean to add fuel to the fire.

Well, I was paid within 24 hours of requesting, so that is good. And yes, I have changed my plan about cashing out but not by a lot. I will probably cash out to 150% of my payza deposit. That would work out to $60 before clawbacks.

The money will be used to buy shares in FC which I have already done.

The rest of the funds will be reinvested in RR's and when that maxes out then maybe cash to save for the next upgrade level

So I'm still on board. I'll let YGP fund my FC ventures though since I need to make back what I've spent in YGP

SolidSnake wrote on 19^th Apr, 2016 at 12:05pm:



It's working for me. Adobe flash(I think it's Adobe) just had an update recently. I am not able to get them on my iPhone though so if you are doing it via phone I'm not surprised it isn't working

I guess it's recycling time again.. 
Thankfully this time I was expecting it and have enough funds in my purchase balance. 

I think I need to track down how often this happens in order to always be prepared, but also to calculate the recycling fees in a long term basis.. 

Edited:

SolidSnake wrote on 31^st May, 2016 at 11:18am:


Ya.....no comment. It seems no matter how many R referrals I get I can't get over the 1200 click mark. I've had 1200 RRs and 1500 RRs and the line has been consistent. I'm not adding more money. They let me share the 'deal' or this will stagnate